Can't Get There from Here

Billerica Local Blog

Mixed Use and Billerica Center

Billerica Town Meeting (TM) has now twice turned down two articles that would create mixed use zoning in Billerica Center.  The old zoning in the Center is mostly General Business that does not permit residential use.  Mixed use zoning would be an overlay, which means the existing zoning remains so a parcel could be developed under the “old” or “new” zoning.  The future of mixed use in Billerica in now unknown.

Short-Term and Direct Benefits

  • Encourage new development
  • Attract a variety of creative development proposals
  • Open 30-acre Billerica Mall parcel to a new set of redevelopment possibilities
  • Shift power over development to Billerica citizens

Long-Term and Indirect Benefits

  • Raise property values
  • More services shopping choices
  • Bring investment into Center infrastructure, making Center more attractive
  • Raise tax revenue
  • Replace buildings on “underperforming” parcels with newer, energy-efficient, modern buildings with locally-appropriate architecture
  • Create bike- and pedestrian friendly environment
  • Build new sidewalks, crosswalks, and off-street walking and biking paths
  • Create new usable open space (parks, playgrounds, and playing fields)
  • Create new civic space
  • Attract new small businesses
  • Build stable commercial tax base
  • Create marketing opportunity
  • Build affordable housing inventory without resorting to 40B
  • Reduce traffic by replacing “high generating” uses such as drive-thru fast food with “low generating” uses such as office and residential and by putting multiple services within walking distance of hundreds of residents.

The October 2009 Attempt to Pass Mixed Use Zoning

  • Article 23 (the language of the overlay) and 24 (assigning it to 57 parcels) is submitted by the Planning Board.
  • 23 was approved by the Finance Committee (8-2), but 24 was not.
  • Town Planner Peter Kennedy delivered a PowerPoint presentation
  • Selectmen Marc Lomardo spoke in favor, Mike Rosa against.  (Andrew Deslaurier was in the queue to speak in favor when the question was moved.
  • After less than 40 minutes of debate time, the motion fails, 99-63.  The margin is 8 votes.  Only 162 of 240 TM members vote on the article.  The rest are either absent or cast no vote.

The objections given by people at microphone include:

  • There will be no place for school buses to pick up children
  • There will be no place for children to play
  • Retired people will not be able to clime stairs to a second floor dwelling
  • Although empty-nesters may have only one car, they might have visitors
  • They will build apartments on top of Billerica Mall
  • It will make the center inaccessible to cars
  • Boston Road is too dangerous to cross on foot
  • Buildings will be 80 feet high
  • The historical part of the center will be ruined
  • Mixed use might be applied to places outside the center
  • People don’t want to walk, they want to drive
  • There are too many people living in the center now.

Here are my responses to the above.

The May 2009 Attempt to Pass Mixed Use Zoning

  • Planning Board’s public hearing (450 notices mailed) was attended by 4 members of the public, none of whom spoke in opposition.  PB votes 6-0 in favor (1 absent).
  • Finance Committee voted 4-4.  Three members were absent.  (In the event of a tie, article is not recommended.)  During this meeting, FinCom member Al Pearson refers to the petitioner, on record, as a “blow-in.”
  • At a second meeting, FinCom considered reconsidering their vote with all 11 members present.  However, FinCom rules say, apparently, that only members present at the original vote can vote on reconsideration.  Reconsideration failed 4-4, with each member voting exactly the same way as the first time.
  • After nearly two hours of TM time, TM votes 91 in favor, 89 opposed to article 33.  Needing a 2/3 majority, motion fails.  During the debate a TMM asks how the sponsors will benefit financially.  (Moderator does not allow the question to be answered.)  Article 34 is withdrawn.
  • Two days later TM entertains reconsideration of the article 33 vote, but this vote fails.

Ground Work for Mixed Use in Billerica

Links to two important documents:

480 Boston Road

At 30 acres, the Billerica Mall site occupies about one-third of the Center.  The parking lot alone is a whopping 12 acres of mostly empty, wasted land.  Few development “programs” are profitable on this parcel under current zoning.  Because of the town’s abnormally high parking requirements, only a large strip mall retail center of about 350,000 square feet (the approximate size of the existing mall footprint or the old Home Depot proposal) is feasible.  But what might it look like with mixed use?  I’ve sketched one idea below:

billericavillage

Notes on the plan:

 

1. This is a concept plan only, for the purpose of illustrating how a mixed-use ‘village’ style project might work on this site.  It is one man’s idea, intended to spark discussion.

2. In order to execute this plan, Town Meeting would need to approve a zoning change.

3. While this plan takes the water easement into account, other easements have not and may provide additional constraints.

4. The plan does not consider required setbacks.

5. The dimensions of the property line are exact, taken from the survey plan.

6. This plan assumes that most of the existing open space remains, but it does not consider existing trees elsewhere on the site, which we may want to leave alone

7. All streets have wide sidewalks.  Alleys would be used for loading, trash, and some parking.

8. Streets would feature parallel parking at store fronts, which is popular with business owners.

9. Walkways would be large enough for emergency vehicles, but no other vehicles would be allowed.

10. Large retail is sited near the northeast parking lot to make taking home large purchases easier.  This space should be used for a grocery store, plus one or two other (about 40ksf maybe?) medium-size ‘anchor’ retailers.

11. Ground floor retail is ideal for restaurants.  Walkways or park area can be used in part for outdoor seating.

12. Third-floor residential would be amenable to affordable housing.

13. Brownstone-style condos would be small (one or two bedroom, 1200-1500 s.f.) to minimize the number of new school children.

14. Parking can be consolidated because of the mix of uses.  In the morning a resident leaves for work, and then someone who works in the development can use the same parking space.  On weekends, offices are generally closed and those spaces can be used by retail patrons, etc.

15. While the village will generate traffic, the peak times for each use will occur at different times.  Residential will peak its ‘out’ trips in the morning, while office will peak its ‘in’ trips at the same time.  Retail will peak at Saturday midday when offices are closed.  This will spread out traffic impact on the surrounding road system.

16. The village will provide many more retail choices (several dozen maybe) than a strip mall (around ten).

17. There would be enough open space to be used for recreational walking, jogging, bike riding, etc.

18. The park would be large enough to host special events, such as Yankee Doodle Homecoming

19. The number of vehicle access points onto the site could be reduced from 5 to 3.

20. The project could easily be built in phases over several years.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.